Message delivery management based on device accessibility

ABSTRACT

A processor may receive an electronic message sent to a first device associated with a user. The electronic message may have a first format. The processor may receive usage information about the first device and a second device associated with the user. The processor may determine whether to send the electronic message to the second device based on the received usage information. The second device may be capable of receiving messages having a second format. The processor may determine, in response to determining to send the electronic message to the second device, whether to transform the electronic message from the first format to the second format. The processor may transform, in response to determining to transform the electronic message to the second format, the electronic message. The processor may transmit the transformed electronic message to the second device.

BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates generally to the field of electronicmessage delivery, and more specifically to delivering an electronicmessage based on user accessibility.

A user may own multiple devices (e.g., a mobile phone, a tablet, adesktop computer, etc.). Each device may have different capabilities andsupport different formats of an electronic message. The user may only beable to interact with one device at a time and an electronic messagesent to the one of the devices may not be responded to, or left unread,until the user is done using interaction with one of the other devices.

SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present disclosure include a method, computer programproduct, and system for delivering an electronic message to a devicecurrently most accessible by a user. A processor may receive anelectronic message sent to a first device associated with a user. Theelectronic message may have a first format. The processor may receiveusage information about the first device and a second device associatedwith the user. The processor may determine whether to send theelectronic message to the second device based on the received usageinformation. The second device may be capable of receiving messageshaving a second format. The processor may determine, in response todetermining to send the electronic message to the second device, whetherto transform the electronic message from the first format to the secondformat. The processor may transform, in response to determining totransform the electronic message, the electronic message to the secondformat. The processor may transmit the transformed electronic message tothe second device.

The above summary is not intended to describe each illustratedembodiment or every implementation of the present disclosure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The drawings included in the present disclosure are incorporated into,and form part of, the specification. They illustrate embodiments of thepresent disclosure and, along with the description, serve to explain theprinciples of the disclosure. The drawings are only illustrative ofcertain embodiments and do not limit the disclosure.

FIG. 1 illustrates a flowchart depicting an example method fortransforming and sending an electronic message to a second device, inaccordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of an example method for determiningwhether to send an electronic message to a second device, in accordancewith embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart of an example method for transforming afirst format of an electronic message to a second format, in accordancewith embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart of an example method for determiningwhether the one or more features of the first format are supported by asecond device, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 depicts a cloud computing environment according to an embodimentof the present invention, in accordance with embodiments of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 6 depicts abstraction model layers according to an embodiment ofthe present invention, in accordance with embodiments of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 7 illustrates a high-level block diagram of an example computersystem that may be used in implementing one or more of the methods,tools, and modules, and any related functions, described herein, inaccordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of an example system for anelectronic message to be transformed and transmitted to a second device,in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.

While the embodiments described herein are amenable to variousmodifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shownby way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. Itshould be understood, however, that the particular embodiments describedare not to be taken in a limiting sense. On the contrary, the intentionis to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives fallingwithin the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Aspects of present disclosure relate generally to the field ofelectronic message delivery, and more specifically to delivering anelectronic message to a device currently most accessible by a user.Further aspects of the present disclosure relate to transforming anelectronic message from a first format to a second format. While thepresent disclosure is not necessarily limited to such applications,various aspects of the disclosure may be appreciated through adiscussion of various examples using this context.

A user may own multiple devices capable of receiving electronic messages(e.g., also referred to herein simply as “messages”). The user may focuson one device at a time and may wish to receive electronic messagesdirectly to the one device rather than having an electronic messagedelivered (e.g., sent, received, etc.) to another device that currentlymay not be accessible to, or in use, by the user. For example, a usermay be reading on a tablet and an electronic message may be meant fordelivery to a cellphone owned by the user. The user may wish to have themessage automatically delivered to the tablet instead of, or in additionto, the cellphone.

In some embodiments, a processor (e.g., computer system, server,telecomm, etc.) may receive an electronic message sent to a user on afirst device. The electronic message may have a first format. Theprocessor may receive usage information about the first device and asecond device associated with the user. The processor may determinewhether to send the electronic message to the second device based on thereceived usage information. The second device may be capable ofreceiving messages having a second format. The processor may determinewhether to transform the electronic message from the first format to thesecond format. The processor may transmit the transformed electronicmessage to the second device. In some embodiments, the processor maydetermine to send the electronic message to the second device based onthe user's association with the relevant second device (e.g., theprocessor may determine that the second device is nearest the user,etc.). In some embodiments, format may include features supported by adevice (e.g., audio, video, etc.) and message types (e.g., MP3, MPEG,MP4, etc.). In some embodiments, format may include only featuressupported by a device or message types.

In some embodiments, the second format may be an appropriate readableformat for the second device. In some embodiments, the second format maybe suitable to be used by a graphical user interface (GUI). For example,a processor may receive an audio-electronic message (e.g., a voicemailmessage) to be delivered to a user on a mobile device. The processor mayidentify a desktop computer that may currently be used by the user tosend the electronic message to. The desktop computer may use anaudiovisual (AV) format (e.g., the appropriate readable format for thedesktop computer) as opposed to the audio format of the electronicmessage for delivery to the mobile device. The processor may transformthe audio format into an AV format and transmit the transformed (e.g.,AV) electronic message to the desktop computer to display to the user(e.g., displaying the message on the desktop computer as subtitles orplain text). In some embodiments, the second format may be the same asthe first format.

In some embodiments, the processor may receive usage information aboutthe first device and the second device. In some embodiments, the processmay determine whether to send the electronic message to the seconddevice based on the received usage information. In some embodiments, theprocessor may compare the usage information about the first device andthe second device and determine, based on the comparing, whether to sendthe electronic message to the second device. In some embodiments, theprocessor may compare the usage information by generating anaccessibility score for each associated device. The accessibility scoresmay be based on user accessibility, capabilities of each associateddevice, state information about each associated device, and/or messageformat.

For example, a processor may receive information that the first devicehas not been used for one hour. The processor may also receiveinformation that the second device has not been used for one minute. Theprocessor may compare the usage information and determine that thesecond device should be sent the electronic message because the seconddevice is more likely to be currently used by, or accessible to, a user.In some embodiments, the processor may have a range of time fornon-usage of a device, such as 1 second to 5 minutes, which may indicatethat the device may be in current use by the user. In some embodiments,the processor may decide not to send the electronic message to thesecond device if the first device has been used within a predeterminedrange of time, such as 1 second to 3 minutes (e.g., the processor mayassume that the first device is currently being used, or accessible by,the user).

In some embodiments, the usage information about the first and seconddevices may include power state information. In some embodiments, whenthe processor receives usage information about the first and seconddevices, the processor may determine that the first device is in alow-energy power state (e.g., the first device is currently off, insleep mode, has a low battery, etc.) and the processor may determinethat the second device is in a high-energy power state (e.g., the seconddevice is currently on, using power to run an application, etc.).Accordingly, the processor may prioritize (e.g., rank, score, etc.) thesecond device over the first device.

For example, a processor may receive an electronic message sent to alaptop. The processor may receive usage information indicating that thelaptop is powered off and that a Bluetooth enabled radio in a car ownedby a user is passively on (e.g., the radio itself is not on but the caris running with latent power going to the radio). The processor maytransform the electronic message (e.g., from a first format, such as atext format) into an appropriate form supported by the radio (e.g., anaudio format) and transmit the transformed electronic message to theradio. For example, the processor may transform the electronic messageusing a text-to-speech application. In some embodiments, the processormay actively turn on the radio and broadcast the transformed electronicmessage to the user. In some embodiments, the radio may already bebroadcasting to the user and the processor may pause the broadcasting torelay the electronic message to the user. In some embodiments, theprocessor may prompt the user to interrupt the broadcast in order toallow the electronic message to be relayed.

In some embodiments, the usage information about the first and seconddevices includes user interaction information. In some embodiments, whenthe processor receives usage information about the first and seconddevices, the processor may determine a first accessibility score for thefirst device based on the user interaction information. The userinteraction information may include the number of times the user hasinteracted with the first device in a given time period. The processormay also determine a second accessibility score for the second devicebased on the user interaction information for the second device in thesame time period.

For example, a processor may receive information that a user has a smarttelevision (e.g., a first device) and a cellphone (e.g., a seconddevice). The processor may additionally receive information that thesmart television has had the user's eyes gazed (e.g., using eye-gazingtechnology that uses built-in cameras to identify that a user is lookingat the device) on the smart television for 5 minutes of the past hour.The processor may also receive information that the cellphone has beengazed upon by the user for 55 minutes of the past hour. The processormay use a count system associated with the 60 minutes in an hour,increasing the accessibility score of the smart television up to 5, onecount for each minute the user gazed at the smart television. Theprocessor may also increase the accessibility score of the cellphone by55.

In some embodiments, when determining the first and second accessibilityscores for the first and second devices, respectively, the processor mayrank the first and second devices based on the first and secondaccessibility scores. In some embodiments, the processor may rank thefirst and second devices by determining that the first device has alower accessibility score than the second device. The processor may thenrank the first device lower than the second device.

Following the example above, the processor may rank the cellphone abovethe smart television as the device most accessible or the devicecurrently being used by the user. The processor may rank the cellphoneabove the smart television in response to the 55 counts given to thecellphone as opposed to the 5 counts given to the smart television. Insome embodiments, the electronic message may be redirected to a seconddevice if the electronic message is a high priority message. In someembodiments, a user may set the priority of a message. For example, auser may set messages from “Mom,” as a high priority and messages from“Brother-in-law,” as low priority. The messages sent from “Mom” may bethe only messages transformed and redirected to a second deviceassociated with the user.

In some embodiments, when ranking the first and second devices based onthe first and second accessibility scores, the processor may weight thefirst and second accessibility scores. In some embodiments, theprocessor may weight the first and second accessibility scores based onwhether the first and second devices are preferred devices (e.g., theuser has prompted the processor to giver preference to one device overanother, the processor has determined that a user favors one device,etc.).

For example, the user may own a tablet, a laptop, and a music player.The user may enable a function that lets the processor know that theuser does not want electronic messages sent to the music player when themusic player is in use (e.g., the music player is a non-preferred deviceto send electronic messages to). The processor may receive userinteraction information and give a higher initial accessibility score tothe music player than the laptop and tablet because the music player isbeing played. However, the processor may weight the accessibility scoredown to zero because the user has indicated that the music player is anon-preferred device while the music player is being used. In someembodiments, the user may mark a device as a preferred device to sendelectronic messages to while the device is being used.

In some embodiments, the processor may weight the first and secondaccessibility scores based on the capabilities of the first and seconddevices. For example, a first device may only allow for audio featuresand a second device may allow for audio and visual features. The firstdevice may have a higher accessibility score than the second device.However, the processor may weight the second device's accessibilityscore higher than the first device because the second device is capableof relaying an electronic message in both an audio and visual form. Insome embodiments, the processor may weight the accessibility score ofthe first and second devices based on devices' capabilities if the firstand second accessibility counts are within a certain range (e.g., thefirst and second devices' accessibility score are within 3 counts ofeach other, etc.).

In some embodiments, the processor may weight the first and secondaccessibility scores based on the format of the electronic message. Forexample, a first device may have a text feature and a second device mayhave an audio feature. An electronic message may be sent to a user in atext format. The processor may receive an initial accessibility scorefor the second device that is higher than the accessibility score forthe first device. However, the processor may weight the accessibilityscore for the first device higher than the accessibility for the seconddevice because the first device is capable of relaying the electronicmessage to the user. In some embodiments, the processor may weight theaccessibility score of the first and second devices based on devices'capabilities if the first and second accessibility counts are within acertain range.

In some embodiments, the processor may determine whether to transformthe electronic message from the first format to the second format. Forexample, a processor may receive an electronic message in image fileformat to be delivered to a first device. The processor may identify asecond device to send the electronic message. The processor may identifythat the second device as capable of receiving the electronic message inan audio format, but not the image file format. The processor maytransform the electronic message from the image file format to the audioformat in order to transmit the electronic message to the second device.

In some embodiments, when transforming the electronic message from thefirst format to the second format, the processor may determine featuresassociated with the first format. The processor may also determinefeatures associated with the second format and hide the featuresassociated with the first format that are not supported by the secondformat. For example, a processor may receive an electronic message in anaudiovisual format meant for delivery to a first device. The processormay identify a second device currently being used by a user. Theprocessor may additionally identify the second device as only using avisual format.

The processor may determine that the features associated with theaudiovisual format are the ability to play a sound file and display avideo file. The processor may also determine the feature associated withthe visual format supported by the second device is the ability todisplay a video file. The processor may transform (e.g., usingspeech-to-text, subtitles, etc.) the audiovisual format of theelectronic message into the visual format by hiding the sound file ofthe electronic message. The processor may hide the sound file in orderfor the sound file to be played at a later time on a device suited foraudio. In some embodiments, the processor may remove (e.g., delete) thefeatures not supported by the second format. In some embodiments, theprocessor may add features supported by the second format to theelectronic message. In some embodiments, the second format has everyfeature of the first format plus one or more features.

In some embodiments, the processor may transmit the transformedelectronic message to the second device. For example, a processor mayreceive an electronic message for delivery to a user on a first device;the first device may support raster graphics formats (e.g., JPEG, PNG,GIF, etc.) in electronic messages. The processor may identify, however,that a user is currently using a second device. The processor mayadditionally identify that the second device may support vector graphicsformats (e.g., DXF, EPS, etc.) in electronic messages.

The processor may transform the electronic message from the rastergraphics format used by the first device to the vector graphics formatused by the second device. The processor may transmit the transformedelectronic message to the second device to be displayed to the user. Insome embodiments, when transmitting the transformed electronic messageto the second device, the processor may pause the normal functions ofthe second device. For example, if the second device is a smarttelevision, the processor may pause the program being watched by a userto transmit and display the electronic message to the user. It is notedthat the steps described above may not be performed in such an order andmay be performed in any order or not at all.

In some embodiments, a processor (e.g., on a system, computer system,server, etc.) may be configured to receive an electronic message fordelivery to a user on a first device. The electronic message may have afirst format. The processor may identify one or more features of thefirst format of the electronic message. The processor may determinewhether the one or more features of the first format are supported by asecond device that supports a second format (e.g., the processor maydetermine the usability of the features by the second device). Theprocessor may transform the first format of the electronic message tothe second format used by the second device.

In some embodiments, the processor may determine whether the one or morefeatures of the first format are supported by the second device bydetermining a second format used by the second device. The processor mayalso identify one or more features of the second format and compare theone or more features of the first format to the one or more features ofthe second format. For example, a processor may receive an electronicmessage in an AV format (e.g., a first format). The processor maydetermine that the AV format contains the features of a sound file and avideo file. The processor may determine that a second device uses anaudio format (e.g., a second format) and identify the feature of theaudio format as a sound file. The processor may compare the features ofthe AV format to the audio format and determine that the audio file usedby the first format may be used by the second format, but that the videofile may not. The processor may transform the first format of theelectronic message to the second format by hiding the video file featureassociated with the AV format. In some embodiments, hiding means onlytransmitting the supported features.

In some embodiments, when the processor is comparing the one or morefeatures of the first format to the one or more features of the secondformat, the processor may determine that at least one of the one or morefeatures of the first format is supported by the second format and thatat least one of the one or more features of the first format is notsupported by the second format. For example, the first format may have aclosed-caption feature and a pause video feature. The second format mayhave a closed-caption feature and a fast forward feature. The processormay determine that the closed-caption feature is supported by the secondformat and that the pause video feature is not supported by the secondformat. The processor may transform the first format to allow the fastforward feature and remove the pause feature.

In some embodiments, all or none of the features of the first format maybe supported by the second format. In some embodiments, the processormay determine that at least one of the features of the first format issimilar or equivalent to at least one feature of the second format andis supported by the second format. For example, the first format mayhave a closed-caption feature and the second format may have aspeech-to-text feature. The processor may determine that theclosed-caption feature is equivalent to the speech-to-text feature andsupported by the second format because the closed-caption featurefunctions as an audio (e.g., speech)-to-text feature.

In some embodiments, the processor may transform the first format of theelectronic message to the second format by determining the one or morefeatures of the first and second formats. The processor may then removeat least one of the one or more features of the first format that arenot supported by the second format. For example, a processor maydetermine that a first format has the features of resolution control andframe-rate control. The processor may also determine that a secondformat has the features of resolution control and contrast control. Theprocessor may remove the frame-rate control feature from the firstformat because it is not supported by the second format.

In some embodiments, when transforming the first format of theelectronic message to the second format, the processor may generate acopy of the electronic message in its original form (e.g., the firstformat). The processor may store the copy of the first format of theelectronic message. For example, a processor may receive an electronicmessage having a first format for delivery to a user on a first device.The processor may identify and determine one or more features of thefirst format supported on a second device that uses a second format.

The processor may copy the first format of the electronic message, so asto have an original version and a copy of the first format. Theprocessor may store the copy of the first format in order to retain anunchanged version (e.g., first format) of the electronic message. Thismay help if the processor determines that the first format is viable fordelivery to the first device over the second device. The processor maysimultaneously, or in addition to, transform the original version of thefirst format of the electronic message into the second format of theelectronic message for delivery to the user on the second device. Insome embodiments, the original version of the first format may remainunchanged and the copy of the first format may be transformed. In someembodiments, the processor may keep original messages in a database forthe user to look at later (e.g., when the user has a device capable ofviewing the messages in their original forms).

Referring now to FIG. 1, illustrated is flowchart of an example method100 for transforming and sending an electronic message to a seconddevice, according to embodiments of the present disclosure. A processoron a device (e.g., smartphone, smart watch, computer, radio, server,etc.) may perform the method 100. In some embodiments, a user mayperform one or more operations in the method 100. In some embodiments,the processor may perform one or more operations in the method 100 inresponse to user input. The method 100 may begin at operation 102, wherethe processor may receive an electronic message sent to a user on afirst device. In some embodiments, the electronic message may have afirst format.

After operation 102, the method 100 may continue to operation 104. Atoperation 104, the processor may receive usage information about thefirst device and a second device. In some embodiments, the usageinformation may be how often a user has moved a device in a period oftime, how long ago the user used the device, how long the device hasbeen looked at by the user, etc. After receiving the usage informationabout the first and second devices at operation 104, the method 100 maycontinue to decision block 106. At decision block 106, the processor maydetermine whether to send the electronic message to the second device.Decision block 106 is discussed further hereinafter with respect to FIG.2. In some embodiments, if at decision block 106, it is determined thatthe electronic message cannot be sent to the second device, or if thefirst device is preferred over the second device, the processor may sendthe message to the first device and the method 100 may end. In someembodiments, the processor may determine whether to send the electronicmessage to the second device based on the usage information receivedabout the first and second devices.

For example, a processor may receive information from a first device, acellphone, indicating that the cellphone is not moving (e.g., thecellphone has been placed on a desk by the user, etc.). The processormay also receive information from a second device, a smart watch,indicating that the smart watch is moving (e.g., due to the user's armswinging while walking, etc.). The processor may determine that thesmart watch should be the target device to send an electronic message toin order for the user to have automatic access to the electronic messageinstead of the user having to return to the cellphone in order toreceive the electronic message.

After decision block 106, the method 100 may continue to decision block108. At decision block 108, the processor may determine if the seconddevice is capable of receiving the electronic message in a secondformat. In some embodiments, if at decision block 108 the processordetermines that the second device is not capable of receiving theelectronic message in a second format, the processor may transmit theelectronic message to the first device and the method 100 may end. Forexample, the processor may determine that the second device is onlycapable of receiving an electronic message in a format, which theprocessor cannot transform the first format into (e.g., the processordoes not support transforming a two-dimensional drawing into athree-dimensional because the processor is missing the third dimensionalconstraint). In some embodiments, if at decision block 108 the processordetermines that the second format is the same as the first format, themethod 100 may end by the processor forwarding the electronic message inthe first format to the second device.

In some embodiments, if at decision block 108 the processor determinesthat the second device is capable of receiving the electronic message ina second format, the method 100 may continue to decision block 110. Atdecision block 110, the processor may determine whether to transform theelectronic message from the first format to the second format. Forexample, a processor may receive an electronic message for delivery to afirst device in a Portable Document Format (PDF). The processor maydetermine a user is currently using a second device. The processor maydetermine that the second device is capable of using an Open DocumentFormat (ODF), but not PDF, and it may determine to transform the PDFversion of the electronic message to an ODF version. In someembodiments, if it is determined not to transform the electronicmessage, the processor may transmit the untransformed message to thesecond device, and the method 100 may end.

After determining whether to transform the electronic message from thefirst format to the second format at decision block 110, the method 100may continue to operation 112. At operation 112, the processor maytransmit the transformed electronic message to the second device.Following the example above, the processor may deliver the ODF versionof the electronic message to the second device. This may allow the userto receive the electronic message without having to return to the firstdevice to view the message. The method 100 may end after transmittingthe transformed electronic message to the second device at operation112.

Referring now to FIG. 2, illustrated is a flowchart of an example method200 for determining whether to send an electronic message to a seconddevice, according to embodiments of the present disclosure. A processoron a device may perform the method 200. In some embodiments, a user mayperform one or more operations in the method 200. The method 200 maybegin at operation 202 where two or more devices associated with a usermay be registered. In some embodiments, the processor may register thedevices based on a unique user identifier (e.g., a number given to theuser, etc.). In some embodiments, the user may register the devices asassociated with the user (e.g., register with a website, securityservice, etc.). In some embodiments, the devices may be registered andstored as being associated with the user in a database table.

After registering two or more devices associated with the user atoperation 202, the method 200 may continue to operation 204. Atoperation 204, the processor may generate a first accessibility scorefor a first device. After generating a first accessibility score atoperation 204, the method 200 may continue to operation 206. Atoperation 206, the processor may generate a second accessibility scorefor a second device.

In some embodiments, the first and second accessibility scores may bebased on usage information received at operation 104 in FIG. 1. In someembodiments, the usage information may be any information aboutinteractions a user has had with the first and second devices. In someembodiments, the usage information may include how long the user hasbeen looking (e.g., gazing, staring, etc.) at the devices (e.g.,detectable by eye-gazing technology), how often the user has touched ascreen of the devices (e.g., detectable by the devices' touchscreen),how many times the user has moved one of the devices (e.g., detectableby a gyroscope in the devices), and/or power state information from eachdevice (e.g., are the devices turned on or off). In some embodiments,the processor may determine a first count for the first device and asecond count for the second device based on the above informationreceived.

In some embodiments, the usage information may include how long the userhas been looking at the devices over a set period of time (e.g., amountof time gazed out of an hour, a minute, etc.), how often the user hastouched a screen of the devices over a set period of time (e.g., touchesper hour, minute, etc.), how many times the user has moved on of thedevices (e.g., number of movements per hour, minute, etc.), and/or powerstate information over a set period of time (e.g., how long has a deviceremained on for a day, how long has a device has remained off for a day,etc.). In some embodiments, the processor may determine a first countfor the first device and a second count for the second device based onthe above information received.

As discussed herein, in some embodiments the accessibility score may begenerated based on, among other things, the capabilities of eachassociated device, usage information, state information about eachassociated device, and/or message format. For example, a first devicethat supports audiovisual messages (e.g., both audio and text) may beranked higher than a second device that only audio. As another example,a cell phone that is a powered off state may receive a lower score thana smart TV that is turned on. In some embodiments, the accessibilityscore may be based on a combination of two or more these factors. Forexample, if the message is an .MP4 message (a format that supports bothaudio and video), devices that support both audio and video may bescored higher than devices that only support audio and devices that onlysupport video/images.

In some embodiments, a user may weight a given factor (e.g., batterystate) or device (e.g., cell phone). The processor may use the scoreeach factor for a particular device and then combine the scores, usingany assigned weighting coefficient, to generate the accessibilityscores. For example, the user may decide that the battery state of thedevice is more important than the usage information (e.g., how often thedevice has been used in the last hour). Accordingly, a device thatscores relatively low in the usage information category (e.g., has notbeen used as recently as a second device) may nevertheless have a higheraccessibility score than the second device if it has a high batterystate (e.g., is powered on) and the second device has a low batterystate (e.g., near dead battery or powered off). Likewise, a user mayweight his cell phone as his preferred device (e.g., because he usuallyhas it on him). Therefore, even if the cell phone has a low battery andthe user's laptop has a full battery, the cell phone may be prioritized(e.g., have a higher accessibility score) because the user hasidentified it as preferred.

After generating the second accessibility score at operation 206, themethod 200 may continue to operation 208. At operation 208, theprocessor may compare the first accessibility score to the secondaccessibility score. For example, a processor may receive usageinformation in the form of device movement over a set time. The firstdevice may have been moved by a user 5 times in the last 15 minutes andthe second device may have been moved by a user 40 times in the last 15minutes. The processor may be programmed to increase a counter for eachdevice for every time the device was moved (e.g., the first device hasan accessibility score of 5 and the second device has an accessibilityscore of 40). The processor may then compare the 5 accessibility scoreof the first device to the 40 accessibility score of the second device.

After comparing the first accessibility score to the secondaccessibility score at operation 208, the method 200 may continue todecision block 210. At decision block 210, the processor may determineif the second accessibility score is greater than the firstaccessibility score. Following the example above, the processor maydetermine, based on the comparing of the first and second accessibilityscores, that the second device is interacted with by the user more thanthe first device (e.g., the second accessibility score is higher thanthe first accessibility score) and may be more likely to be currentlyaccessible to the user.

If at decision block 210 the second accessibility score is determined tobe greater than the first accessibility score, the method 200 mayprocess to operation 212 where the electronic message is sent to thesecond device. If at decision block 210 the second accessibility scoreis determined to be less than the first accessibility score, the method200 may proceed to operation 214 where the electronic message is sent tothe first device. In some embodiments, at operation 214 the electronicmessage may be sent to the first device in the first format. In someembodiments, the processor may determine a rank for the first and seconddevices based on the first and second accessibility scores,respectively.

In some embodiments, a user may be associated with more than twodevices. In these embodiments, the processor may generate accessibilityscores for each device (or for a subset of the devices). The scoreddevices may then be ranked according to their accessibility scores, andthe message may be sent to the device with the highest accessibilityscore. In some embodiments, the electronic message may only be sent to asecond device (e.g., a device other than the one originally sent to) ifthe accessibility score of the second device exceeds the accessibilityscore of the first device by a threshold amount (e.g., a scalar amountor a percentage). The threshold may be set by a user, or heuristicallyby the processor using historical information. In some embodiments, theelectronic message may only be sent to a second device if the firstdevice has not been used within a particular amount of time. Forexample, even if the second device has a higher accessibility score, ifthe user has interacted with the first device within a particular amountof time (e.g., in the last 5 minutes), the message may be sent to thefirst device and not the second device. Alternatively, in someembodiments the message may be sent to both the first and seconddevices.

Referring now to FIG. 3, illustrated is a flowchart of an example method300 for transforming a first format of an electronic message to a secondformat, according to embodiments of the present disclosure. A processor(e.g., in a system, computer system, server, etc.) may perform themethod 300. In some embodiments, a user may perform one or moreoperations in the method 300. In some embodiments, a processor mayperform one or more operations in the method 300 in response to userinput. The method 300 may begin at operation 302 where the processor mayreceive an electronic message for delivery to a user on a first devicein a first format.

After receiving the electronic message for delivery to the user on thefirst device in the first format at operation 302, the method 300 maycontinue to operation 304. At operation 304, the processor may identifyone or more features of the electronic message. For example, a processormay receive an electronic message in Rich Text Format (RTF). Theprocessor may identify the features of an RTF as having the ability toformat text and add image in text.

After identifying one or more features of the first format of theelectronic message at operation 304, the method 300 may continue tooperation 306. At operation 306, the processor may determine whether theone or more features of the first format are supported by a seconddevice (e.g., the usability of the one or more features of the firstformat by the second device). Operation 306 is discussed furtherhereinafter with respect to FIG. 4. In some embodiments, the processormay identify a second device to determine usability of features byreceiving user usage information from the second device indicating thatthe second device is currently accessible to the user. In someembodiments, there may be more that two devices, for example, the method300 may determine usability of the features of the first format for alldevices owned by a user (e.g., a first device, a second device, a thirddevice, a fourth device, etc.).

After determining whether the one or more features of the first formatare supported by a second device at operation 306, the method 300 maycontinue to operation 308. At operation 308, the processor may transformthe electronic message to a second format. In some embodiments,transforming the electronic message to a second format may includehiding or removing features of the electronic message that are notsupported by the second format. In some embodiments, transforming theelectronic message to a second format may include adding featuressupported by the second format that are not supported by the firstformat.

For example, a processor may receive an electronic message for deliveryto a user on a cellphone in a Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)audio-visual format. The processor may identify the features of the MPEGaudio-visual format as having the ability to display visual graphics toa user and the ability to broadcast aural frequencies to the user. Theprocessor may also determine that a computer is currently being used bythe user and may be a better choice to deliver the electronic message tothan the cellphone. The processor may determine that the display andaural features of the MPEG audio-visual format are supported by thecomputer.

The processor may transform the MPEG audio-visual format to anappropriate format with added features supported by the computer. Theprocessor may transform the MPEG audio-visual format by separating theaudio and visual features of the MPEG, running a speech-to-text program,and adding subtitles to the visual feature when playing the electronicmessage on the computer. In some embodiments, the processor may enhancethe visual feature of the MPEG (e.g., upscale/upconvert, convert to MP4)because the computer may have a higher resolution than the cellphone. Insome embodiments, the processor may add features supported by the secondformat in addition to removing features not supported by the secondformat.

In some embodiments, the processor may identify one or more documentsassociated with the electronic message. In some embodiments, theprocessor may insert one or more identifiers (e.g., links,recommendations, symbols, etc.) corresponding to the one or moredocuments into the electronic message. In some embodiments, theprocessor may intelligently search (e.g., using search features of thefirst or second devices, applications found in a system, the Internet,etc.) for other documents, objects, videos, pictures, etc. that arecomparable to the first format (e.g., the MPEG).

For example, the processor may separate the audio and visual features ofthe MPEG and generate a written document from the audio portion. Theprocessor may compare the written document to other transcripts found bythe processor to determine that the MPEG is apart of a movie named, “HitSummer Movie.” The processor may insert a link (e.g., identifier) to“Hit Summer Movie” in the electronic message displayed to the user inorder for the user to fully understand the context of the electronicmessage. In some embodiments, the processor may insert a link to othermedia associated with “Hit Summer Movie.” This may be done in order forthe user to have access to other media that they may enjoy. In someembodiments, the processor may use the visual portion to compare againstother known media, videos, etc.

Referring now to FIG. 4, illustrated is a flowchart of an example method400 for determining whether the one or more features of the first formaton a second device, according to embodiments of the present disclosure.A processor may perform the method 400. In some embodiments, a user mayperform one or more operations in the method 400. The method 400 maybegin at operation 402 where the processor may determine a second formatused by the second device.

After determining a second format used by the second device at operation402, the method 400 may continue to operation 404. At operation 404, theprocessor may identify one or more features of the second format. Afteridentifying one or more features of the second format, the method 400may continue to operation 406. At operation 406, the processor maycompare the one or more features of the first format to the one or morefeatures of the second format.

For example, a processor may receive an electronic message with documentattachments for delivery to a first device. The first device may use afirst format that supports the features of audio output, visual display,and automatic attachment opening. The processor may also receiveinformation from a second device indicating that a user is currentlyusing the second device. The processor may determine a second formatused by the second device.

The processor device may identify the second format as supporting visualdisplay, automatic attachment opening, and automatic recognition ofmisspelled words in attachments. The processor may compare the featuresof the first format and the features of the second format. The processormay determine that the visual display and automatic attachment openingfeatures of the first format are supported on the second device.

The processor may transform the first format of the electronic messageto the second format supported by the second device by hiding the audiooutput feature and adding the automatic recognition feature. The usermay receive the electronic message on the second device as a visual textmessage with all attachments already opened and misspelled wordshighlighted in the attachments for the user to easily identify andchange issues in the attachments.

It is to be understood that although this disclosure includes a detaileddescription on cloud computing, implementation of the teachings recitedherein are not limited to a cloud computing environment. Rather,embodiments of the present invention are capable of being implemented inconjunction with any other type of computing environment now known orlater developed.

Cloud computing is a model of service delivery for enabling convenient,on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computingresources (e.g., networks, network bandwidth, servers, processing,memory, storage, applications, virtual machines, and services) that canbe rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort orinteraction with a provider of the service. This cloud model may includeat least five characteristics, at least three service models, and atleast four deployment models.

Characteristics are as follows:

On-demand self-service: a cloud consumer can unilaterally provisioncomputing capabilities, such as server time and network storage, asneeded automatically without requiring human interaction with theservice's provider.

Broad network access: capabilities are available over a network andaccessed through standard mechanisms that promote use by heterogeneousthin or thick client platforms (e.g., mobile phones, laptops, and PDAs).

Resource pooling: the provider's computing resources are pooled to servemultiple consumers using a multi-tenant model, with different physicaland virtual resources dynamically assigned and reassigned according todemand. There is a sense of location independence in that the consumergenerally has no control or knowledge over the exact location of theprovided resources but may be able to specify location at a higher levelof abstraction (e.g., country, state, or datacenter).

Rapid elasticity: capabilities can be rapidly and elasticallyprovisioned, in some cases automatically, to quickly scale out andrapidly released to quickly scale in. To the consumer, the capabilitiesavailable for provisioning often appear to be unlimited and can bepurchased in any quantity at any time.

Measured service: cloud systems automatically control and optimizeresource use by leveraging a metering capability at some level ofabstraction appropriate to the type of service (e.g., storage,processing, bandwidth, and active user accounts). Resource usage can bemonitored, controlled, and reported, providing transparency for both theprovider and consumer of the utilized service.

Service Models are as follows:

Software as a Service (SaaS): the capability provided to the consumer isto use the provider's applications running on a cloud infrastructure.The applications are accessible from various client devices through athin client interface such as a web browser (e.g., web-based e-mail).The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloudinfrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, storage,or even individual application capabilities, with the possible exceptionof limited user-specific application configuration settings.

Platform as a Service (PaaS): the capability provided to the consumer isto deploy onto the cloud infrastructure consumer-created or acquiredapplications created using programming languages and tools supported bythe provider. The consumer does not manage or control the underlyingcloud infrastructure including networks, servers, operating systems, orstorage, but has control over the deployed applications and possiblyapplication hosting environment configurations.

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): the capability provided to theconsumer is to provision processing, storage, networks, and otherfundamental computing resources where the consumer is able to deploy andrun arbitrary software, which can include operating systems andapplications. The consumer does not manage or control the underlyingcloud infrastructure but has control over operating systems, storage,deployed applications, and possibly limited control of select networkingcomponents (e.g., host firewalls).

Deployment Models are as follows:

Private cloud: the cloud infrastructure is operated solely for anorganization. It may be managed by the organization or a third party andmay exist on-premises or off-premises.

Community cloud: the cloud infrastructure is shared by severalorganizations and supports a specific community that has shared concerns(e.g., mission, security requirements, policy, and complianceconsiderations). It may be managed by the organizations or a third partyand may exist on-premises or off-premises.

Public cloud: the cloud infrastructure is made available to the generalpublic or a large industry group and is owned by an organization sellingcloud services.

Hybrid cloud: the cloud infrastructure is a composition of two or moreclouds (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities butare bound together by standardized or proprietary technology thatenables data and application portability (e.g., cloud bursting forload-balancing between clouds).

A cloud computing environment is service oriented with a focus onstatelessness, low coupling, modularity, and semantic interoperability.At the heart of cloud computing is an infrastructure that includes anetwork of interconnected nodes.

Referring now to FIG. 5, illustrative cloud computing environment 510 isdepicted. As shown, cloud computing environment 510 includes one or morecloud computing nodes 500 with which local computing devices used bycloud consumers, such as, for example, personal digital assistant (PDA)or cellular telephone 500A, desktop computer 500B, laptop computer 500C,and/or automobile computer system 500N may communicate. Nodes 500 maycommunicate with one another. They may be grouped (not shown) physicallyor virtually, in one or more networks, such as Private, Community,Public, or Hybrid clouds as described hereinabove, or a combinationthereof. This allows cloud computing environment 510 to offerinfrastructure, platforms, and/or software as services for which a cloudconsumer does not need to maintain resources on a local computingdevice. It is understood that the types of computing devices 500A-Nshown in FIG. 5 are intended to be illustrative only and that computingnodes 500 and cloud computing environment 510 can communicate with anytype of computerized device over any type of network and/or networkaddressable connection (e.g., using a web browser).

Referring now to FIG. 6, a set of functional abstraction layers providedby cloud computing environment 510 (FIG. 5) is shown. It should beunderstood in advance that the components, layers, and functions shownin FIG. 6 are intended to be illustrative only and embodiments of theinvention are not limited thereto. As depicted below, the followinglayers and corresponding functions are provided.

Hardware and software layer 600 includes hardware and softwarecomponents. Examples of hardware components include: mainframes 602;RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) architecture based servers 604;servers 606; blade servers 608; storage devices 610; and networks andnetworking components 612. In some embodiments, software componentsinclude network application server software 614 and database software616.

Virtualization layer 620 provides an abstraction layer from which thefollowing examples of virtual entities may be provided: virtual servers622; virtual storage 624; virtual networks 626, including virtualprivate networks; virtual applications and operating systems 628; andvirtual clients 630.

In one example, management layer 640 may provide the functions describedbelow. Resource provisioning 642 provides dynamic procurement ofcomputing resources and other resources that are utilized to performtasks within the cloud computing environment. Metering and Pricing 644provide cost tracking as resources are utilized within the cloudcomputing environment, and billing or invoicing for consumption of theseresources. In one example, these resources may include applicationsoftware licenses. Security provides identity verification for cloudconsumers and tasks, as well as protection for data and other resources.User portal 646 provides access to the cloud computing environment forconsumers and system administrators. Service level management 648provides cloud computing resource allocation and management such thatrequired service levels are met. Service Level Agreement (SLA) planningand fulfillment 650 provide pre-arrangement for, and procurement of,cloud computing resources for which a future requirement is anticipatedin accordance with an SLA.

Workloads layer 660 provides examples of functionality for which thecloud computing environment may be utilized. Examples of workloads andfunctions which may be provided from this layer include: mapping andnavigation 662; software development and lifecycle management 664;virtual classroom education delivery 666; data analytics processing 668;transaction processing 670; and transforming a first format of anelectronic message to a second format 672.

Referring now to FIG. 7, shown is a high-level block diagram of anexample computer system 701 that may be used in implementing one or moreof the methods, tools, and modules, and any related functions, describedherein (e.g., using one or more processor circuits or computerprocessors of the computer), in accordance with embodiments of thepresent disclosure. In some embodiments, the major components of thecomputer system 701 may comprise one or more CPUs 702, a memorysubsystem 704, a terminal interface 712, a storage interface 716, an I/O(Input/Output) device interface 714, and a network interface 718, all ofwhich may be communicatively coupled, directly or indirectly, forinter-component communication via a memory bus 703, an I/O bus 708, andan I/O bus interface unit 710.

The computer system 701 may contain one or more general-purposeprogrammable central processing units (CPUs) 702A, 702B, 702C, and 702D,herein generically referred to as the CPU 702. In some embodiments, thecomputer system 701 may contain multiple processors typical of arelatively large system; however, in other embodiments the computersystem 701 may alternatively be a single CPU system. Each CPU 702 mayexecute instructions stored in the memory subsystem 704 and may includeone or more levels of on-board cache.

System memory 704 may include computer system readable media in the formof volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 722 or cachememory 724. Computer system 701 may further include otherremovable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storagemedia. By way of example only, storage system 726 can be provided forreading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magneticmedia, such as a “hard drive.” Although not shown, a magnetic disk drivefor reading from and writing to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk(e.g., a “floppy disk”), or an optical disk drive for reading from orwriting to a removable, non-volatile optical disc such as a CD-ROM,DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided. In addition, memory 704can include flash memory, e.g., a flash memory stick drive or a flashdrive. Memory devices can be connected to memory bus 703 by one or moredata media interfaces. The memory 704 may include at least one programproduct having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules that areconfigured to carry out the functions of various embodiments.

One or more programs/utilities 728, each having at least one set ofprogram modules 730 may be stored in memory 704. The programs/utilities728 may include a hypervisor (also referred to as a virtual machinemonitor), one or more operating systems, one or more applicationprograms, other program modules, and program data. Each of the operatingsystems, one or more application programs, other program modules, andprogram data or some combination thereof, may include an implementationof a networking environment. Programs 728 and/or program modules 730generally perform the functions or methodologies of various embodiments.

Although the memory bus 703 is shown in FIG. 7 as a single bus structureproviding a direct communication path among the CPUs 702, the memorysubsystem 704, and the I/O bus interface 710, the memory bus 703 may, insome embodiments, include multiple different buses or communicationpaths, which may be arranged in any of various forms, such aspoint-to-point links in hierarchical, star or web configurations,multiple hierarchical buses, parallel and redundant paths, or any otherappropriate type of configuration. Furthermore, while the I/O businterface 710 and the I/O bus 708 are shown as single respective units,the computer system 701 may, in some embodiments, contain multiple I/Obus interface units 710, multiple I/O buses 708, or both. Further, whilemultiple I/O interface units are shown, which separate the I/O bus 708from various communications paths running to the various I/O devices, inother embodiments some or all of the I/O devices may be connecteddirectly to one or more system I/O buses.

In some embodiments, the computer system 701 may be a multi-usermainframe computer system, a single-user system, or a server computer orsimilar device that has little or no direct user interface, but receivesrequests from other computer systems (clients). Further, in someembodiments, the computer system 701 may be implemented as a desktopcomputer, portable computer, laptop or notebook computer, tabletcomputer, pocket computer, telephone, smart phone, network switches orrouters, or any other appropriate type of electronic device.

It is noted that FIG. 7 is intended to depict the representative majorcomponents of an exemplary computer system 701. In some embodiments,however, individual components may have greater or lesser complexitythan as represented in FIG. 7, components other than or in addition tothose shown in FIG. 7 may be present, and the number, type, andconfiguration of such components may vary.

Referring now to FIG. 8, illustrated a block diagram of an examplesystem 800 for an electronic message to be transformed and transmittedto a second device, according to embodiments of the present disclosure.The system 800 may include a non-user device 810, a server 820, a user'sfirst device 830, and a user's second device 840.

Consistent with various embodiments, the non-user device 810 may includea processor 812, a memory 814, and a network interface 816. The server820 may include a processor 822, a memory 824, and a network interface826. The user's first device 830 may include a processor 832, a memory834, and a network interface 836. The user's second device 840 mayinclude a processor 842, a memory 844, and a network interface 846. Insome embodiments, the network interfaces 816, 826, 836, and 846 may be,e.g., modems or network interface cards. In some embodiments, thenon-user device 810, the server 820, the user's first device 830, andthe user's second device 840 may all communicate through via a network(not shown).

In some embodiments, the network can be implemented using any number ofany suitable communications media. For example, the network may be, butis not limited to, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network(LAN), an internet, an intranet, the Internet, one or more hardwireconnections (e.g., Ethernet connections), a wireless link or router, anyother suitable wireless or wired communication link, or any combinationthereof. In some embodiments, the network can be implemented within acloud computing environment, or using one or more cloud computingservices. Consistent with various embodiments, a cloud computingenvironment may include a network-based, distributed data processingsystem that provides one or more cloud computing services. Further, acloud computing environment may include many computers (e.g., hundredsor thousands of computers or more) disposed within one or more datacenters and configured to share resources over the network.

In some embodiments, the system 800 may begin operating at step 1 wherethe non-user device 810 (e.g., a device not associated/registered withthe user) sends an electronic message to a user on the user's firstdevice 830. In some embodiments, the server 820 (e.g., a server operatedby a telecommunication or internet provider) may receive the electronicmessage sent to the user. The system 800 may continue to steps 2 a and 2c, where the processor 822 may query for usage information from theuser's first device 830 and the user's second device 840.

The user's first device 830 may send the usage information, which insome embodiments may include a first accessibility count, to the server820. The user's second device 840 may likewise send the usageinformation, which in some embodiments may include a secondaccessibility count, to the server 820. In some embodiments, the user'sfirst device 830 and the user's second device 840 may have the usageinformation stored in the memories 834 and 844, respectively. In someembodiments, the processors 832 and 842 may access the usage informationform the memories 834 and 844, respectively.

In some embodiments, the step 2 a may be skipped and the system 800 maycontinue to step 2 b where the user's first device 830 may send itsusage information to the user's second device 840. The system 800 maycontinue to step 2 c where the user's second device 840 may transferboth the usage information for the user's first device 830 and theuser's second device 840 to the server 820. In some embodiments, step 2b may be performed in order for the user's second device 840 todetermine whether it is currently being used or is more accessible thanthe user's first device 830. In some embodiments, if the user's seconddevice 840 determines at step 2 b that is currently being used or moreaccessible than the user's first device 830, the user's second device840 may determine, for the system 800, whether to proceed to step 2 c.

Upon the server 820 receiving the usage information at steps 2 a and 2 c(or at step 2 c following step 2 b), the server 820 may determine tosend the electronic message to the user's second device 840 (e.g., theserver 820 may identify an accessibility count as higher for the user'ssecond device 840). After the server 820 determines to send theelectronic message to the user's second device 840, the processor 822may transform the electronic message from a first format to a secondformat and transmit the electronic message in the second format to theuser's second device 840.

In some embodiments, at steps 2 a and 2 c the server 820 may alsoreceive information describing the features supported by the firstformat of the electronic message used by the user's first device 830 andfeatures supported by the second format used by the user's second device840. The processor 822 in the server 820 may determine the usability ofthe features of the first format on the user's second device 840. Insome embodiments, the supported features of the first and second devices830 and 840 may be stored by the server 820 (e.g., in a database table).Upon determining the usability, the server 820, using the processor 822may transform the electronic message to the second format used by thesecond device.

In some embodiments, the server 820 may receive usage information andusability of features information from the user's second device 840 atstep 2 c. In some embodiments, the user's first device 830 may send itsusage information and information regarding the features of the firstformat used by the user's first device 830 to the user's second device840. The user's second device 840 may store the information on thememory 844, and using the processor 842 determine the features supportedby the second format of the electronic message and whether the first orsecond accessibility count is higher. The processor 842 may sent thealready processed information (e.g., which count is higher and usabilityinformation) to the server 820. In some embodiments, the server may thendetermine whether or not to transform the electronic message to a secondformat and which device to send the electronic message.

In some embodiments, processor may receive an electronic message fordelivery to a user on a first device. The electronic message may have afirst format. The processor may identify one or more features of thefirst format of the electronic message. The processor may determinewhether the one or more features of the first format are supported by asecond device. The processor may transform the first format of theelectronic message to the second format used by the second device.

As discussed in more detail herein, it is contemplated that some or allof the operations of some of the embodiments of methods described hereinmay be performed in alternative orders or may not be performed at all;furthermore, multiple operations may occur at the same time or as aninternal part of a larger process.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product. The computer program product may include a computerreadable storage medium (or media) having computer readable programinstructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of thepresent invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers, and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, andconventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computeror entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example,programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), orprogrammable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readableprogram instructions by utilizing state information of the computerreadable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry,in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that the computerreadable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises anarticle of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects ofthe function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram blockor blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of theorder noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present disclosurehave been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intendedto be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Manymodifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skillin the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the describedembodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain theprinciples of the embodiments, the practical application or technicalimprovement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enableothers of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodimentsdisclosed herein.

Although the present invention has been described in terms of specificembodiments, it is anticipated that alterations and modification thereofwill become apparent to the skilled in the art. Therefore, it isintended that the following claims be interpreted as covering all suchalterations and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scopeof the invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system comprising: a memory; and a processor incommunication with the memory, the processor being configured to performoperations comprising: receiving an electronic message sent to a firstdevice associated with a user, the electronic message having a firstformat; receiving usage information about the first device and a seconddevice associated with the user; determining whether to send theelectronic message to the second device based on the received usageinformation, the second device being capable of receiving messageshaving a second format, wherein determining whether to send theelectronic message to the second device based on the received usageinformation comprises: comparing the usage information about the firstdevice to the usage information about the second device, whereincomparing the usage information about the first device to the usageinformation about the second device further comprises: identifying afirst accessibility score for the first device based on the usageinformation of the first device, wherein the usage information for thefirst device includes how many times the first device has beeninteracted with by the user during a set period of time; identifying asecond accessibility score for the second device based on the usageinformation of the second device, wherein the usage information for thesecond device includes how many times the second device has beeninteracted with by the user during the set period of time; and comparingthe first accessibility score to the second accessibility score; anddetermining that the second accessibility score is higher than the firstaccessibility score; determining, in response to determining to send theelectronic message to the second device, whether to transform theelectronic message from the first format to the second format;transforming, in response to determining to transform the electronicmessage to the second format, the electronic message; and transmittingthe transformed electronic message to the second device.
 2. The systemof claim 1, wherein the usage information about the first and seconddevices includes power state information, and wherein receiving usageinformation about the first and second devices further comprises:determining that the first device is in a low-energy power state; anddetermining that the second device is in a high-energy power state. 3.The system of claim 1, further comprising: ranking the first and seconddevices based on the first and second accessibility scores.
 4. Thesystem of claim 3, wherein ranking the first and second devices based onthe first and second accessibility scores further comprises: weightingthe first and second accessibility scores based on whether the first andsecond devices are preferred devices; weighting the first and secondaccessibility scores based on the capabilities of the first and seconddevices; and weighting the first and second accessibility scores basedon the format of the electronic message.
 5. A computer program productcomprising a computer readable storage medium having programinstructions embodied therewith, the program instructions executable bya processor to cause the processor to perform a method, the methodcomprising: receiving an electronic message sent to a first deviceassociated with a user, the electronic message having a first format;receiving usage information about the first device and a second deviceassociated with the user; determining whether to send the electronicmessage to the second device based on the received usage information,the second device being capable of receiving messages having a secondformat, wherein determining whether to send the electronic message tothe second device based on the received usage information comprises:comparing the usage information about the first device to the usageinformation about the second device, wherein comparing the usageinformation about the first device to the usage information about thesecond device further comprises: identifying a first accessibility scorefor the first device based on the usage information of the first device,wherein the usage information for the first device includes how manytimes the first device has been interacted with by the user during a setperiod of time; identifying a second accessibility score for the seconddevice based on the usage information of the second device, wherein theusage information for the second device includes how many times thesecond device has been interacted with by the user during the set periodof time; and comparing the first accessibility score to the secondaccessibility score; and determining that the second accessibility scoreis higher than the first accessibility score; determining, in responseto determining to send the electronic message to the second device,whether to transform the electronic message from the first format to thesecond format; transforming, in response to determining to transform theelectronic message to the second format, the electronic message; andtransmitting the transformed electronic message to the second device. 6.The computer program product of claim 5, wherein the usage informationabout the first and second devices includes power state information, andwherein receiving usage information about the first and second devicesfurther comprises: determining that the first device is in a low-energypower state; and determining that the second device is in a high-energypower state.
 7. The computer program product of claim 5, furthercomprising: ranking the first and second devices based on the first andsecond accessibility scores.
 8. The computer program product of claim 7,wherein ranking the first and second devices based on the first andsecond accessibility scores further comprises: weighting the first andsecond accessibility scores based on whether the first and seconddevices are preferred devices; weighting the first and secondaccessibility scores based on the capabilities of the first and seconddevices; and weighting the first and second accessibility scores basedon the format of the electronic message.